Content review has not yet been formally shared with the newsroom and its recommendations are not yet in effect, but it is affecting the way people work: The deadlock has resulted in a newsroom being split turn, according to interviews with 25 current and former employees members. They say the company has avoided making the proposed changes because of a power struggle between Mr. Murray and the newcomer. the publisher, Almar Latour, contributed to the Future-threatening impasse of the Journal.
Mr. Murray and Mr. Latour, 50, represent the two extremes of the model Murdoch employee. Mr. Murray is a skillful editor; Mr. Latour is a talented businessman. Both have risen in the organization almost at the same time. When it comes time to replace Gerry Baker as top editor in 2018, both are considered candidates.
According to people who understand this matter, the two men have never been compatible. Or as one well-informed CEO said, “They hate each other.” The digital strategy report only adds to the tension in their relationship – and with it the gems of the Murdoch news empire.
Their enduring professional rivalry comes down to both personality and approach. Mr. Murray appeared to be more deliberate, while Mr. Latour quickly moved into action. But the core of their friction remains a mystery, according to people familiar with them.
Dow Jones, in a statement, countered that feature, saying that there was no friction between the editor and the publisher. It also cites “record profits and record registrations”, which it considers “the wisdom in its current strategy.” Both Mr. Murray and Mr. Latour declined to be interviewed for the article.
About a month after the report was sent, Ms. Story’s strategy team was concerned that their work might never turn out, said three people with knowledge of the matter, and a manuscript. was leaked to one of The Journal’s media reporters, Jeffrey Trachtenberg. He submitted a detailed article about it late last summer.
But at first glance that external readers, and most employees, get about the material are not in the Journal. In October, a stripped-down version of the Content Review was leaked to BuzzFeed News, which included a link to the document in landscape format. (The staff members, eager to read the reports, had to turn their heads 90 degrees.)